There are laws in place that govern immigration. Those who have family members living overseas can apply for an immigrant visa to bring those people legally to the United States. The rules for family visas are different depending on your relationship to that person and other circumstances. When the relative happens to be your niece, nephew, cousin or other minor relative, laws are much different than they are for adults.
The rules that apply to adopted children are much different than those for family members, even if the child in question is actually related to you. These rules actually depend on whether or not the child in question is considered to be an orphan. You should understand that the definition for orphan also takes on different meanings where immigration laws are concerned.
Technically speaking, an orphaned child is one that has no parents because those parents have died or have disappeared and no one knows where they are. Children who are deserted or abandoned by their parents and those who are separated and lost from their parents are also considered to be orphaned. If adoptive parents plan to adopt a child who lives overseas and they do not see that child physically before the foreign adoption takes place then another legal adoption must take place when the parents and the adopted child return to the United States.
In order to qualify legally for United States immigration as an immediate family member, the orphaned child must by adopted by someone who is a legal citizen of the United States and his or her spouse. An unmarried citizen may also adopt a foreign child if that citizen is at least 25 years of age. In either case, the adoption can take place in the child’s home country or in the U.S. The Attorney General must believe that the parents adopting the child are able to provide for that child and the adoption has to take place before the child is 16 years old.
Because adopting foreign children can be tricky, it is always best to consult with an attorney who has a bit of experience in these cases. Your attorney can help you to file the appropriate paperwork and ensure that you are doing everything legally to bring your adopted child home.
Divorce and custody cases can be long, drawn out affairs that cause emotional and often financial stress. Divorce cases are held in family law court and clients are represented by family law attorneys. During divorce, it is often the children that are most affected and protecting children from emotional damage is essential.
That being said, there are cases that can take months or even years to finalize and determining who retains primary custody of the children can be difficult for the courts to determine. If there is not an issue of abuse or an otherwise unfit parent, there are many things that will have to be considered before custody will be awarded. Retaining an experienced attorney who specializes in child custody cases is essential for any parent seeking custody.
In the absence of issues that prove a parent to be unfit, both parents have the legal right to gain custody of their children in divorce cases. Parents can opt for joint custody and this works for many families but in the event that both parents do not live in the same state or other issues arise that would make sharing custody unfeasible, other arrangements will need to be made. Normally, one parent retains primary custody and the absent parent is granted certain rights to visitation. The frequency of visitation will also depend on a number of different factors.
Child custody cases can be confusing, emotionally draining and often very frustrating. Without a reliable attorney who is well-versed in child custody laws in your state, you may find it very difficult to get through such a case. Choosing an experienced attorney is the best way to ensure that your parental rights are protected. Thorough research should be done before choosing an attorney and you have to ensure that the firm you select has experience in child custody and divorce cases and that your attorney can provide you with competent legal representation.
If you are considering conducting your own market research, there are a few things that you will need to keep in mind. Many prefer to hire a firm for their market research due to time constraints and other matters. If you are on the fence and cannot decide whether you should do your own research or hire a professional, there are a few things that could help you to make up your mind.
Market research can be a major undertaking. It can also be an expensive one. While the costs involved are going to be about the same either way you go, the time involved is not. If you do not have the time to invest in thorough research, you are much better off to hire a firm for this task. You simply will not be able to conduct effective research if you do not have the time to spend doing so.
Whether or not you hire a firm may also depend on where you are. For instance, if you need to perform Russian market research then you may need to see if there are any firms in Russia that provide this service. Once you have found a firm, you need to weigh the pros and cons of hiring that firm as opposed to doing the market research yourself. If you are confident that you can come up with the questions that you need to gather the right information, you may very well be able to conduct your own research. You will also need to ensure that you have the time to conduct the research and that you have the resources needed. If you know without a doubt that you can handle this task then you can do it yourself. However, if you are the least bit sceptical about whether or not you can conduct effective research, it may be best to hire it done.
Buying health insurance is not a daunting task but there are a few things to know when buying insurance and for you to get sufficient health coverage. A good health insurance policy with benefit you by covering your present medical requirements as well as will protect you from events like illnesses and accidents. You must get an extensive health policy that will cover the fees of doctors, expensive treatments such as chemotherapy, screening and diagnostic tests, hospital expenses, medicinal expenses, rehabs and mental health care expenses.
You should be careful of marketing gimmicks. You must handle agents, e-mail, faxes, telemarketers and door-to-door salesmen wisely. They offer a lot, come up with lucrative discount policies, may show low premium policies and convince you for big savings, which may not be ideal for you according to your present condition. They will continuously stress on buying health insurance policies talking about new reforms. If you accept, you may end up selecting junk and useless insurance policy, which is not going to do much for you if you really need to use the policy. In fact, some options may appear cheaper and comprehensive in comparison to individual policies. These policies can be sometimes be bought with pre-existing conditions. However, not everyone is eligible for some of these policies
It is extremely beneficial to get into a group insurance plan through the job of a single member. You can get into the coverage of any member who has a job in case you have no other coverage options. The children can be included in the insurance of their parents for example and this can continue right up until they are in their middle 20’s. Comprehensive cover can be found online but make sure that it is legitimate and will also give you a strong level of protection.
In a move that will affect music lovers everywhere as well as have prominent rumblings within the legal realm, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it will allow Sony/ATV Music Publishing to purchase EMI’s music publishing business. The EMI Group, sometimes known as EMI Music, is one of the largest recording labels in the world but in early 2011 the London-based corporate giant fell into the hands of Citigroup Inc. after it could not pay off loan and debt obligations. Since then numerous corporations and businesses have attempted to purchase parts of EMI from Citigroup but because the transactions are so incredibly massive they require approval from the Federal Trade Commission. European trade authorities have already previously given the massive transaction the green light and no red flags were triggered because Sony is only purchasing music publishing aspect of EMI.
The Federal Trade Commission sealed the deal on June 28, 2012, after voting five to zero to close further investigations and questionings surrounding the transaction. Although the purchase of EMI’s music publishing company is fetching an outrageous amount of around 2.2 billion dollars, the transaction does not present a very effectual change in the primary function of the publishing company. The news bits and rumors surrounding the Sony-EMI transaction for the acquisition of EMI’s music publishing business have been in the media and legal spotlight recently because of the simultaneous pending transaction of Universal attempting to purchase the core company of EMI. The staggering 1.9 billion dollar transaction attempt by Universal to procure the majority of EMI has caused outrage from consumer groups and turned the heads of U.S. Senate committees as they believe a monopoly is forming. Indeed these complaints and allegations are not without merit as it would completely remove one of the four major record labels and result in only three remaining for competition.
Thousands upon thousands of people have only just recently discovered that they have been mis sold PPI and because of this they have been able to claim back the money that has been paid into the scheme. However, what is a PPI and how can you be mis-sold one?
First off, a payment protection insurance is taken out in regards to a loan or credit that you have so this can mean a credit card from your bank or a mortgage from a lender however the insurance comes into play when you are unable to pay for your repayments because you have either lost your job due to being made redundant or you have had to leave work because you have become ill or something along these lines. The trouble started when many people discovered that they actually had a PPI agreement without consenting to it first or if they did consent then they did not have all the facts and were not told of what a PPI was and how they were eligible for one. Indeed, there are still a great number of people who have a PPI in their contract but who do not even know about it and they could be in line for a big claim as well.
To get a PPI then you need to be in full time employment however a lot of people were actually students or even retired when they were sold a PPI and therefore they had been paying this insurance for a number of years before they even realised that they were not even eligible for one. Contact an expert to see if you can actually claim for being mis-sold one of these policies and you may even get a surprise at the amount of money you have paid over the years and the amount of money you are owed.
A tough new law in the state of Alabama has had the result of hundreds of parents signing legal documents to ensure that their children can be legally cared for by other relatives and friends should they find themselves in trouble with the law. Indeed, many are living in a state of constant fear over deportation.
The new legal code specifies that law enforcement can stop anyone and ask about their residential and legal status in the state and it also allows for stricter methods to detain and deport illegal immigrants. Many of the children in question are legal American citizens as they were born in the country however, in most cases their parents are not; having entered the states illegally many years ago. It leaves for a legal grey area whereby the child would be eligible to stay in the state but their parents would not hence the large rise in concerned parents essentially handing over control, legally anyway, to friends and relatives should the worst happen.
Civil rights campaigners have been protesting and demanding a federal block on the controversial bill however it is set to stay until at least the end of November when an appeal will begin to be heard. Indeed, many of the parents who had came to the United States illegally have no legal guardians for their children and the result would either be taking them back to their own country or leaving them in state care; an option that imposing on their fundamental rights opponents of the law argue.
A leading UN official on freedom of expression and human rights has called on the Asian nation of Thailand to seriously consider changing the law in regard to Lese Majeste. Frank La Rue is urging the country to have a serious public consultation and debate over the controversial law as he said that it may be coming into conflict with Thailand’s human rights obligations.
The Lese Majeste law means that anyone who offends or in some way insults the Thai monarchy can expect to serve a long and arduous prison sentence. Indeed, another controversial Thai law (The Computer Crimes Act) is also serving to prosecute and convict people under the harsh terms of the Lese Majeste law. Anyone found guilty of defamation against the Royal Family, and especially online due to the new legislation, can be imprisoned for up to 5 years in Thailand’s brutal penal system.
La Rue argues that it fundamentally violates the human right of freedom of expression something that Thailand is supposed to adhere to given that, since 1996, it has been a supporter of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which legal binds the country to certain human rights obligations that La Rue believes it is breaking. Indeed the UN official further states that both Thai’s Lese Majeste law and the Computer Crimes Act are ambiguous in their wording and can lead to some very vague and unclear convictions; another breach of the international human rights charter that the country is supposedly following.
A startling rise in amount of foster children succumbing to identity theft has finally convinced law makers to address the problem. Recent studies have shown that foster children are far more likely to be the victim if identity theft and this can have adverse effects for them in later life as many grow up to find that their credit rating has been misused or that they owe thousands of dollars in their name.
A new amendment to the federal law now means that states are required to run checks on foster children’s names, especially older ones that are in care, so as to first determine whether any of them have been victims of having their identity stolen and secondly to resolve the issue before the child becomes an adult and has to deal with the repercussions of it all.
Some studies have estimated that around 30% of children in foster care have had their identity stolen at one time or another due to the fact that children are themselves too young to take out credit – therefore giving them a good credit rating – and have clean social security numbers. Indeed, children as a group are far more likely to fall victim to identity theft with around 10% having their names and details misused compared to only around 2% of adults.
The new law has been in circulation in some states (most notably California and Colorado) however the new federal legislation will make it compulsory for all children in foster care to have their details checked when they leave care and many are further campaigning for every foster care child to have an annual check against their name.
The unmanned drone has almost been a symbol of modern warfare; representing the shift from manpower to technological supremacy and how the 21st century conflict will be fought more with computers and intelligence than sheer strength in numbers. However, the legality of these devices has been called in question several times since the turn of the century and whether or not they are actually legal to use is somewhat of a grey area.
Christine Fair, a professor at Georgetown, argues that the use of drones is one of the United States’ most lucrative advantages over other countries when it comes to gathering intelligence and information. She goes on to say that it is one of the most successful tools ever in warfare and has foiled countless terrorists and militants giving credence to the argument that, if drones aren’t necessarily legal then they certainly should be.
However some argue that they are not a lawful weapon if used outside the theatre of war. While drones have been most popular in the recent conflicts of both Afghanistan and Iraq, they have also been deployed in Pakistan, Sudan and Yemen and it is here that Mary Ellen O’Connell, a professor at Notre Dame, has argued that they break international law. While O’Connell can justify the use of drones in combat situations where they provide a valuable service and can prevent casualties and human error, using them outside of the combat zone is unlawful although her critics respond with the assertion that if we are locked in a global war on terror then surely the whole world is a battlefield?